Seeking Therapies for Stargardt Macular Dystrophy
Clinical research teams are working toward a treatment for Stargardt disease. How far have they come?
Autosomal recessive Stargardt macular dystrophy (STGD1) is the most common form of inherited macular degeneration, affecting roughly in 1 in 10,000 people. It results from mutation in the ATP-binding cassette, subfamily A, member 4 (ABCA4) gene, which leads to the formation of lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).
AT A GLANCE
• Stargardt macular dystrophy is the most common form of inherited macular degeneration, but there are no treatments available for it.
• Clinical trials are evaluating the safety and efficacy of several potential treatments, including visual cycle modulation, complement inhibition, gene therapy, and subretinal transplantation of stem cell–derived RPE cells.
Juvenile and early-adult STGD1 usually occurs in patients aged 8 to 25 years; late-adult onset STGD1 may occur in older adults. Patients develop irreversible vision loss due to atrophy of the macular RPE and loss of photoreceptors. Patients with early disease onset have worse visual outcomes than those with later onset.
Accumulation of lipofuscin in the RPE, a hallmark of STGD1, causes a pattern of yellowish elongated lesions or flecks that extend outward from the macula; it has been proposed that these are degenerated photoreceptor cells (Figure 1).1-3 However, presentation is heterogeneous: Juvenile and early-adult STGD1 have varying distributions of flecks, degrees of macular atrophy, and progression. Late-onset STGD1 usually presents with perifoveal atrophy with preserved foveal function and structure that subsequently degenerates in later adulthood.
On funduscopic examination, patients may demonstrate an atrophic or bull’s-eye appearance in the macular region, which may be more apparent on fundus autofluorescence imaging. The diffuse accumulation of lipofuscin material results in the classic dark, or silent, choroid seen on fluorescein angiography due to masking of choroidal fluorescence.
The Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) studies are ongoing evaluations documenting the natural history of STDG1 in more than 200 patients at multiple clinical sites. Investigators in the studies have noted that change in BCVA over 12 months is minimal and varies depending on baseline VA. Consequently, change in BCVA has been determined not to be a sensitive 1-year outcome measure.4 Researchers are assessing the possibility of using microperimetry as a more accurate functional outcome measure for future clinical trials.5 In ProgStar, both fundus autofluorescence and OCT are being assessed as anatomic endpoints for progression of atrophy (Figure 2).6,7
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.
ABCA4 acts as a membrane transporter for the recycling of chromophores during the visual cycle. Without its functional transporter, vitamin A byproducts, or dimers (bisretinoids, some of which include A2E and ATR-dimer), accumulate in the RPE after phagocytosis of the photoreceptor outer segments. Vitamin A dimers are toxic to cultured RPE cells, and they are thought to play a significant role in lipofuscin formation and subsequent retinal degeneration in STGD1 (Figure 3).8,9
There are no commercially available treatments for STGD1. This article reviews investigational therapies now in clinical trials, including visual cycle modulators that aim to reduce accumulation of vitamin A dimers, complement inhibitors, gene therapy, and stem cell therapy.
VITAMIN A DIMERIZATION: ALK-001
The rate-determining step in vitamin A dimerization is the cleavage of a C20 carbon-hydrogen bond of the retinaldehyde-PE Schiff base.10 Replacing the C20 hydrogen atoms of vitamin A with deuterium atoms (ie, C20-D3-vitamin A) renders this bond more difficult to cleave and impedes vitamin A dimerization. Studies in mice have investigated whether slowing the intrinsic reactivity of vitamin A to dimerize could slow lipofuscin formation in the RPE and could thus delay changes associated with development of human STGD1.11,12
Preclinical studies have supported the development of the oral once-daily C20-D3-vitamin A molecule ALK-001 (Alkeus Pharmaceuticals). A phase 1 trial (NCT02230228) assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of this compound in healthy volunteers has been completed. The phase 2 TEASE study, a multicenter double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02402660), will enroll 50 patients. The trial is estimated to be completed in December 2021.
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.
VISUAL CYCLE MODULATION: EMIXUSTAT
Emixustat HCl (ACU-4429, Acucela) is a small nonretinoid derivative of retinylamine that affects the visual cycle. It inhibits retinoid isomerohydrolase (sometimes referred to as “RPE65” because it is encoded by the RPE65 gene), thus reducing the conversion of all-trans-retinyl ester to 11-cis-retinol and preventing accumulation of A2E (Figure 4). Data from a phase 1 study showed that the drug was well-tolerated up to 75 mg with expected dose-dependent suppression of scotopic electroretinogram in healthy patients.13 Emixustat was initially developed as an investigational agent with the aim of slowing the progression of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), but a phase 2b/3 trial failed to meet its primary endpoint.14 The compound is now being assessed as a potential treatment for STGD1. A phase 2a study (NCT03033108) in 23 patients has been completed, but no results have been posted. A phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study (NCT03772665) is enrolling 162 patients with macular atrophy secondary to STGD1.
COMPLEMENT INHIBITION: AVACINCAPTAD PEGOL
A2E and other bisretinoids are thought to have an inflammatory effect by activating the complement system in RPE cells.15-17 Increased complement activation and inflammatory markers have been observed in ABCA4-/- mice, associated with RPE dysfunction and photoreceptor degeneration.18 C5 complement plays a role in the terminal portion of the complement pathway, where the lectin, classical, and alternative complement pathways merge to form an inflammasome (ie, a multiprotein complex responsible for activation of inflammatory responses) and membrane attack complex, or MAC, both of which result in cell death.19
In a mouse model of ABCA4-/-, viral vector gene therapy was used to increase expression in the RPE of complement receptor 1–like protein, which is a complement-negative regulatory protein. This resulted in reduced complement levels of C3/C3b in the RPE, along with a twofold reduction in bisretinoid accumulation compared with sham-injected ABCA4-/- mice. On histologic evaluation, there were 30% fewer lipofuscin granules and significantly more photoreceptor nuclei in the outer nuclear layer compared to sham-injected ABCA4-/- mice after 1 year.20 This study suggested that complement inhibition could be a feasible treatment option for preventing RPE and photoreceptor degeneration in STGD1.
Avacincaptad pegol (Zimura, Iveric Bio) is a C5 complement inhibitor that may prevent formation of MAC, consequently reducing cell death caused by destruction of the cell membrane. It is delivered by intravitreal injection and is being explored as a potential treatment option for STGD1 and AMD-related geographic atrophy. A phase 2b double-masked sham-controlled study (NCT03364153) has recruited 95 STGD1 patients and will follow them for 18 months. The primary endpoint of the study is mean rate of change of the area of ellipsoid zone defects as measured by spectral-domain OCT.
ABCA4 GENE THERAPY: LENTIVIRUS VECTORS AND OTHER Approaches
The ABCA4 gene (6.8 kb) exceeds the 4.5 to 5.0 kb capacity of the adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector, so equine infectious anemia lentivirus (EIAV) has been used for gene transfer. Subretinal injection of EIAV-ABCA4 was found to be effective in a knockout ABCA4 -/- mouse model in which treated eyes had a significant reduction of A2E concentrations compared with untreated and mock-treated (EIAV-null vector) control eyes.21
Sanofi is enrolling 41 patients with STGD1 in an escalating-dose phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating SAR422459, formerly known as StarGen (NCT01367444). The trial will investigate safety and preliminary signs of efficacy over a 48-week follow-up period and is expected to be completed this summer. Another study (NCT01736592) is assessing long-term safety and tolerability of the treatment in patients in the original SAR422459 trial. Patients in this trial will be followed without further intervention for 15 years.
Another approach to addressing the large size of the ABCA4 gene is to split the gene across two AAV vectors. Inside the host cell, the two transgene fragments combine to generate the ABCA4 gene. Preclinical work in an ABCA4 knockout mouse model has been presented, showing that dual AAV vectors can be used to deliver ABCA4 gene, which in turn expresses protein and has an effect on lipofuscin/A2E accumulation.22
An alternative to viral vector delivery for gene therapy is nanoparticle technology, which can accommodate large genes such as ABCA4 for injection into the subretinal space. In a STGD1 mouse model, eyes that were injected with subretinal ABCA4 nanoparticles were found to have ABCA4 transgene expression that peaked at 2 months and lasted for up to 8 months. The eyes showed reduced lipofuscin granules on histopathologic evaluation and improvement of dark-adaptation recovery on ERG.23
Another strategy involves the use of oligonucleotides to address common splice defects in the ABCA4 gene. Antisense oligonucleotides can restore ABCA4 splicing defects caused by deep intronic mutations associated with STGD1.24 Given that the effect is not long-lasting, quarterly treatments via intravitreal injections have been proposed. ProQR is developing an antisense oligonucleotide that addresses a common intronic mutation that causes an aberrant splice site which, in turn, leads to exclusion of exon 39.25 This approach has been validated by ProQR in Leber congenital amaurosis, with promising results seen in a phase1/2 trial.
STEM CELL THERAPY FOR STGD1
Given that RPE cell dysfunction is thought to play a major role in the pathogenesis of STGD1, stem cell therapy has been explored as an option to rejuvenate or replace damaged RPE cells. Stem cells can be derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells, or adult stem cells. hESCs can divide and differentiate into a variety of cell types. Induced pluripotent stem cells can be derived from a previously differentiated cell source, and use of this route may negate both ethical controversy and immunologic issues associated with hESC-based therapies.
The eye is an ideal candidate for stem cell therapy research for three reasons: The clear ocular media allow direct visualization of transplanted cells, the eye is a relatively immune-privileged site, and the eye requires smaller quantities of therapeutic tissue compared with other organs. Preclinical studies of hESC-derived RPE cells transplanted into the subretinal space of mouse models of retinal degeneration have been well tolerated, and the cells sustained visual function and photoreceptor integrity in a dose-dependent fashion.26,27
Given the success of preclinical studies, phase 1/2 clinical trials have been designed to test safety and preliminary signs of efficacy of subretinal transplantation of hESC-derived RPE cells in patients with STGD1 and AMD (NCT01345006 and NCT02445612). All patients in the trials had baseline VA of 20/200 to hand motions. In nine patients with atrophic AMD and nine with STGD1 who were treated with hESC-derived stem cells, no signs of acute rejection were noted after surgery. The 3-year results supported continued safety of the hESC-RPE transplantation. The patients with STGD1 gained a mean 4.1 ETDRS letters in the treated eye and 3.3 letters in the untreated eye at 3 years’ follow-up (5.8 and 4.0 letters, respectively, when visually significant cataract was excluded).28,29 Further studies will explore the safety and efficacy of hESC-derived RPE cells using an updated cell line compliant with current guidelines.
HOPE IS NEAR
Although there are no commercially available treatments for STGD1, there are several categories of therapeutics under investigation to potentially fulfill this unmet need. With continued rapid therapeutic innovation, the future for patients with this disorder is hopeful.
1. Eagle RC Jr, Lucier AC, Bernardino VB Jr, et al. Retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities in fundus flavimaculatus: a light and electron microscopic study. Ophthalmology.1980;87(12):1189-1200.
2. Hadden OB, Gass JD. Fundus flavimaculatus and Stargardt’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82(4):527-539.
3. Paavo M, Lee W, Allikmets R, et al. Photoreceptor cells as a source of fundus autofluorescence in recessive Stargardt disease. J Neurosci Res. 2019;97(1):98-106.
4. Kong X, Strauss RW, Cideciyan AV, et al. Visual acuity change over 12 months in the prospective progression of atrophy secondary to Stargardt disease (ProgStar) study: ProgStar report number 6. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(11):1640-1651.
5. Schonbach EM, Wolfson Y, Strauss RW, et al. Macular sensitivity measured with microperimetry in Stargardt disease in the progression of atrophy secondary to Stargardt disease (ProgStar) study: report no. 7. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(7):696-703.
6. Strauss RW, Munoz B, Ho AC, et al. Progression of Stargardt disease as determined by fundus autofluorescence in the retrospective progression of Stargardt disease study (ProgStar report no. 9). JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(11):1232-1241.
7. Strauss RW, Munoz B, Ho AC, et al. Incidence of atrophic lesions in Stargardt disease in the progression of atrophy secondary to Stargardt disease (ProgStar) study: report no. 5. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(7):687-695.
8. Sparrow JR, Fishkin N, Zhou J, et al. A2E, a byproduct of the visual cycle. Vision Res. 2003;43(28):2983-2990.
9. Lamb LE, Simon JD. A2E: a component of ocular lipofuscin. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;79(2):127-136.
10. Kaufman Y, Ma L, Washington I. Deuterium enrichment of vitamin A at the C20 position slows the formation of detrimental vitamin A dimers in wild-type rodents. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(10):7958-7965.
11. Ma L, Kaufman Y, Zhang J, et al. C20-D3-vitamin A slows lipofuscin accumulation and electrophysiological retinal degeneration in a mouse model of Stargardt disease. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(10):7966-7974.
12. Charbel Issa P, Barnard AR, Herrmann P, et al. Rescue of the Stargardt phenotype in Abca4 knockout mice through inhibition of vitamin A dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(27):8415-8420.
13. Kubota R, Boman NL, David R, et al. Safety and effect on rod function of ACU-4429, a novel small-molecule visual cycle modulator. Retina. 2012;32(1):183-188.
14. Dugel PU, Novack RL, Csaky KG, et al. Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, 90-day study of emixustat hydrochloride in geographic atrophy associated with dry age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2015;35(6):1173-1183.
15. Zhou J, Kim SR, Westlund BS, et al. Complement activation by bisretinoid constituents of RPE lipofuscin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1392-1399.
16. Zhou J, Jang YP, Kim SR, et al. Complement activation by photooxidation products of A2E, a lipofuscin constituent of the retinal pigment epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(44):16182-16187.
17. Berchuck JE, Yang P, Toimil BA, et al. All-trans-retinal sensitizes human RPE cells to alternative complement pathway-induced cell death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(4):2669-2677.
18. Radu RA, Hu J, Yuan Q, et al. Complement system dysregulation and inflammation in the retinal pigment epithelium of a mouse model for Stargardt macular degeneration. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(21):18593-18601.
19. Cao S, Wang JC, Gao J, et al. CFH Y402H polymorphism and the complement activation product C5a: effects on NF-kappaB activation and inflammasome gene regulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(5):713-718.
20. Lenis TL, Sarfare S, Jiang Z, et al. Complement modulation in the retinal pigment epithelium rescues photoreceptor degeneration in a mouse model of Stargardt disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(15):3987-3992.
21. Kong J, Kim SR, Binley K, et al. Correction of the disease phenotype in the mouse model of Stargardt disease by lentiviral gene therapy. Gene Ther. 2008;15(19):1311-1320.
22. Dyka FM, Hauswirth WW. Dual adeno-associated virus vector treatment of autosomal recessive Stargardt disease. Paper presented at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; April 2018; Honolulu, HI.
23. Han Z, Conley SM, Makkia RS, et al. DNA nanoparticle-mediated ABCA4 delivery rescues Stargardt dystrophy in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(9):3221-3226.
24. Garanto A, Sangermano R, Albert S, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide- based restoration of ABCA4 splicing defects caused by deep-intronic mutations associated with Stargardt disease. Paper presented at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; April 2018; Honolulu, HI.
25. ProQR R&D Day Presentation. January 29, 2019, New York. Data on file with ProQR. https://ir.proqr.com/static-files/a04d2d08-6e89-437a-9057-3d409f6f447e. Accessed June 24, 2019.
26. Lund RD, Wang S, Klimanskays I, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cells rescue visual function in dystrophic RCS rats. Cloning Stem Cells. 2006;8(3):189-199.
27. Lu B, Malcuit C, Wang S, et al. Long-term safety and function of RPE from human embryonic stem cells in preclinical models of macular degeneration. Stem Cells. 2009;27(9):2126-2135.
28. Schwartz SD, Regillo C, Lam BL, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelial transplantation for retinal degenerations: three-year outcomes data. Paper presented at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; April 2018; Honolulu, HI.
29. Schwartz SD, Regillo C, Lam BL, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in patients with age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt’s macular dystrophy: follow-up of two open-label phase 1/2 studies. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):509-516.
Thomas A. Ciulla, MD, MBA
• Chief Medical Officer, Clearside Biomedical, Alpharetta, Georgia
• Volunteer Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
• Board of Directors, Midwest Eye Institute, Indianapolis
• Financial disclosure: Employee, Salary, Stock Options (Clearside Biomedical)