Retinoblastoma is a rare disease. There are only an estimated 250 to 350 cases per year in the United States, and the disease accounts for only 4% of pediatric malignancies. Nonetheless, clinical and basic scientific observations about this disease continue to advance each year, and 2012 was no exception. This brief paper reviews recent clinical developments in the field.

Intraarterial Chemotherapy

Many publications in 2012 from the United States and Europe centered on an increased understanding of the dosing, complications, side effects, and outcomes of the intraarterial chemotherapy approach. This treatment was initiated in Japan more than 20 years ago.1 In 2008, Abramson et al2 published the first report in the United States about the use of this treatment with modern catheterization techniques.

Three studies this year by Venturi et al,3 Shields et al,4 and Abramson et al5 examined Kaplan-Meier rates of ocular salvage in groups of untreated and previously treated patients (Table 1). Two of the three groups4,5 reported that ocular salvage rates in eyes that were naïve to treatment were higher than in those that had previously undergone systemic chemotherapy or other treatments. In contrast, Venturi et al3 reported that eyes that had previously undergone other forms of treatment responded better to intraarterial chemotherapy than treatment-naïve eyes. Overall, salvage rates of eyes in both groups of patients in all centers was above 50% at 2 years.

As with all new therapies, several authors have raised concerns about potential new complications that were not an issue with older therapies (Table 2).6-9 There have been no intracranial cerebrovascular events and no deaths reported after the procedure in any centers. A series of intraocular and orbital side effects and complications have been noted, many of which are transient, some of which are permanent and/or visionlimiting. The most common transient complications after the procedure seem to be orbital congestion limiting motility, loss of lashes, and a skin rash along the supratrochlear distribution. The most common visionlimiting side effects seem to be retinal and choroidal infarcts.

Several authors have noted that, as with all surgical procedures, there appears to be a learning curve with the procedure in which the interventional neurosurgeon becomes more facile with the procedure over time and fewer intraocular complications occur, especially ischemic ones.7 A close examination of Table 2 reveals that groups with larger series (eg, more experience) have lower complication rates than those from centers reporting their first small series of patients.

Intravitreal Chemotherapy

Although the intravitreal injection has become widely adopted as routine practice for adult retinal diseases, it has not taken hold as a treatment approach for retinoblastoma, despite the fact that vitreous seeds represent the major cause of tumor control failures requiring enucleation surgery (Figures 1 and 2). The injection of chemotherapy intravitreally was first reported by Ericson and Rosengren11 in 1961 using thiotepa for the treatment of retinoblastoma10 and has been studied extensively in animals. It is widely performed in retinoblastoma patients in Japan. Recently, at the biennial meeting of the International Society of Ocular Oncology in Buenos Aires, in November 2011, Suzuki and Kaneko reported that they had performed 896 injections in 237 eyes of 227 patients and that only 1 eye (0.4%) was judged to have had extraocular extension caused by an injection at a mean follow-up of 91 months. Of note, many of these patients also had treatment with intraarterial chemotherapy or radiation.

Nonetheless, for years, clinicians taking care of retinoblastoma patients in the United States and Europe were concerned about the use of intravitreal injections due to the risk of extraocular spread of tumor outside the globe. Karcioglu et al12 published the results of a pathology study in 1985 that convinced clinicians for several decades that biopsies were risky. In this study, the authors performed 16 biopsies in 4 globes (3 with retinoblastoma and 1 with uveal melanoma) using a 25-gauge needle. Approximately half of the needle tracks demonstrated viable tumor cells on sectioning, although the authors reported that there were fewer cells than had been demonstrated to cause metastases in animal models.

Over the past year, several authors have reported on the emerging use of this treatment in a renewed interest in salvaging eyes with resistant vitreous seeds and a belief that perhaps the risk for extraocular extension may not be as great as previously thought (Table 3). Of note, there was a wide range of ocular salvage rates with this technique, from 0% to 83%, with salvage rates increasing with series size.

Conclusion

Rapid innovation in clinical approaches to treatment continues in retinoblastoma despite the rare nature of the disease and minimal collaboration among centers. Intraarterial and intravitreal chemotherapy both show promise for improved ocular salvage and visual results, although very long-term follow-up has not yet been achieved in patients treated with these approaches.

Amy C. Schefler, MD, is an ocular oncology and vitreoretinal specialist at Retina Consultants of Houston. Dr. Schefler may be reached at +1 713 5243434; fax: +1 713 524 3220; or at acsmd@houstonretina.com.

  1. Mohri M. The technique of selective ophthalmic arterial infusion for conservative treatment of recurrent intraocular retinoblastoma [in Japanese]. Keio Igaku. 70:679-687.
  2. Abramson DH, Dunkel IJ, Brodie SE, Kim JW, Gobin YP. A phase I/II study of direct intraarterial (ophthalmic artery) chemotherapy with melphalan for intraocular retinoblastoma initial results. Ophthalmology. 2008. 115(8):1398-1404.
  3. Venturi C, Bracco S, Cerase A, et al. Superselective ophthalmic artery infusion of melphalan for intraocular retinoblastoma: preliminary results from 140 treatments. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan 23. doi: 10.1111/j.1755- 3768.2011.02296.x. [Epub ahead of print]
  4. Shields CL, Bianciotto CG, Jabbour P, et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: report No. 1, control of retinal tumors, subretinal seeds, and vitreous seeds. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1399-1406.
  5. Abramson DH, Marr BP, Dunkel IJ, et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma in eyes with vitreous and/or subretinal seeding: 2-year results. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:499-502.
  6. Shields CL, Fulco EM, Arias JD, et al. Retinoblastoma frontiers with intravenous, intra-arterial, periocular, and intravitreal chemotherapy. Eye (Lond). 2012 Oct 19. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.218. [Epub ahead of print]
  7. Shields CL, Kaliki S, Rojanaporn D, Al-Dahmash S, Bianciotto CG, Shields JA. Intravenous and intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: what have we learned? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:202-209.
  8. Abramson DH. Chemosurgery for retinoblastoma: what we know after 5 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1492-1494.
  9. Levin MH, Gombos DS, O'Brien JM. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for advanced retinoblastoma: is the time right for a prospective clinical trial? Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1487-1489.
  10. Ericson LA, Rosengren BH. Present therapeutic resources in retinoblastoma. Acta Ophthalmologica. 1961;39:569-576.
  11. Kaneko A, Suzuki S. Eye-preservation treatment of retinoblastoma with vitreous seeding. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;33:601-607.
  12. Karcioglu ZA, Gordon RA, Karcioglu GL. Tumor seeding in ocular fine needle aspiration biopsy. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:1763-1767.
  13. Muen WJ, Kingston JE, Robertson F, Brew S, Sagoo MS, Reddy MA. Efficacy and complications of super-selective intra-ophthalmic artery melphalan for the treatment of refractory retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:611-616.
  14. Schaiquevich P, Ceciliano A, Millan N, et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy is more effective than sequential periocular and intravenous chemotherapy as salvage treatment for relapsed retinoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Sep 28. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24356. [Epub ahead of print]
  15. Munier FL, Soliman S, Moulin AP, Gaillard MC, Balmer A, Beck-Popovic M. Profiling safety of intravitreal injections for retinoblastoma using an anti-reflux procedure and sterilisation of the needle track. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1084-1087.
  16. Kivela T, Eskelin S, Paloheimo M. Intravitreal methotrexate for retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1689.
  17. Ghassemi F, Shields CL. Intravitreal melphalan for refractory or recurrent vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:1268-1271.
  18. Smith SJ, Pulido JS, Salomao DR, Smith BD, Mohney B. Combined intravitreal and subconjunctival carboplatin for retinoblastoma with vitreous seeds. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1073-1077.